Report Card

Grade
---
  Are Illinois Children Entering School Ready? Equity Gap
  Metric Current 2-Year Prior Leading State IL Rank White Afr Am Latino Low Inc Spec Ed
 
ProgressKindergarten-readiness
% Children Demonstrating Readiness for Kindergarten
More Info
Footnote
This is not currently measured, but a state working group is in the process of developing recommendations on an approach to measuring preschoolers' cognitive, social, emotional, physical, and developmental.
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AData unavailable
 
  Do Illinois Children Have Access to High Quality Programs? Equity Gap
  Metric Current 2-Year Prior Leading State IL Rank White Afr Am Latino Low Inc Spec Ed
 
AccessAt-risk access
% At-risk children under 3 with access to a program that includes home visiting
More Info
Footnote
Percentage of at-risk children with access to home visiting programs, including Early Head Start and IDHS Child and Adolescent Health. 20% of Illinois children under the age of 3 are considered 'at risk'. Source: Illinois Early Childhood Asset Map. 2009. Source
7.1%6.7%N/AN/AN/AData unavailable
3-year old access
% 3-year-olds enrolled in state-funded pre-school or Head Start
More Info
Footnote
This includes Illinois Pre-K and Head Start (excludes Special Ed). For this indicator and indicator #12, the “equity gap” represents a demographic breakdown of both 3 and 4 year olds in Illinois Preschool for All and Head Start programs. Source: National Institute for Early Education Research. The state of preschool 2009. Source. Source for equity gap data (Preschool for All): Illinois State Board of Education. 2009. Source for equity gap data (Head Start): Center for Law and Social Policy. Illinois Head Start by the Numbers. 2009. Source
29%27%IL 1st35%31%28%N/AN/A
4-year old access
% 4-year-olds enrolled in state-funded pre-school or Head Start
More Info
Footnote
This includes Illinois Pre-K and Head Start (excludes Special Ed). For this indicator and indicator #12, the “equity gap” represents a demographic breakdown of both 3 and 4 year olds in Illinois Preschool for All and Head Start programs. Source: National Institute for Early Education Research. The state of preschool 2009. Source. Source for equity gap data (Preschool for All): Illinois State Board of Education. 2009. Source for equity gap data (Head Start): Center for Law and Social Policy. Illinois Head Start by the Numbers. 2009. Source
40%38%OK87%13th35%31%28%N/AN/A
Accredited programs
% Children served by State Licensed Programs with national accreditation
More Info
Footnote
Number of childcare slots in programs accredited by the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC), divided by the number of Illinois 3 and 4 year olds who are not in state or federal Pre-K programs. (State and federal Pre-K programs do not traditionally seek NAEYC accreditation.) Source: National Association for the Education of Young Children. 2009. Source
18%16%MA66%6thData unavailable
Bilingual access
% English Language Learners in Appropriate Program
More Info
Footnote
Early childhood bilingual education data is collected by the state, and should be available in the future. Currently, there is not accurate information about how many early childhood bilingual students have access to bilingual instructors and/or instruction.
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AData unavailable
 
  Are Illinois Children Taught by Effective Educators? Equity Gap
  Metric Current 2-Year Prior Leading State IL Rank White Afr Am Latino Low Inc Spec Ed
 
EnvironmentQualified instructors
% Instructors with a BA degree or higher, and early years qualification
Footnote
Illinois ties with 10 other states in which 100% of early years educators are qualified with a B.A. or higher. Data is unavailable for nine states. Although this metric refers to academic qualifications, a measure of the impact that educators have on child development would be preferable, but does not exist. Source: National Institute for Early Education Research. The state of preschool 2009. Source
100%100%IL11st / 41Data unavailable
 
  Are We Providing Students with an Environment that Supports Learning? Equity Gap
  Metric Current 2-Year Prior Leading State IL Rank White Afr Am Latino Low Inc Spec Ed
 
EnvironmentInstructional time
Hours per day in school
More Info
Footnote
State-reported minimum number of hours per day for half-day programs. Illinois ties with eight other states. Source: National Institute for Early Education Research. The state of preschool 2009. Source
2.52.5OR, DE, PA3.510th / 19Data unavailable
Quality of environment
ECERS/CLASS rating
More Info
Footnote
We need to better understand the quality of environment in our preschools. The Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale (ECERS) and Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS) are two examples of tools that have been developed to assess environments across several domains. No such assessment is currently carried out at the state level in Illinois. Source: Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale. Source
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AData unavailable
 
  Are Students On-Track? Equity Gap
  Metric Current 2-Year Prior Leading State IL Rank White Afr Am Latino Low Inc Spec Ed
 
ProgressDevelopmental screening
% Early learners receiving developmental screening
Footnote
Percent of 1, 2, and 3 year olds who have been screened for motor, language, and social development, an important tool for catching developmental problems early. Source: Illinois Department of Health and Family Services. 2010. Source
35%26%N/AN/AN/AData unavailable
 
  Are Students On-Track in Early Grades? Equity Gap
  Metric Current 2-Year Prior Leading State IL Rank White Afr Am Latino Low Inc Spec Ed
 
Progress4th grade math
% 4th graders Proficient in Reading on NAEP
More Info
Footnote
National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). Low income defined as 'eligible for free/reduced price school lunch'. Source: National Center for Education Statistics. The nation's report card: Reading 2009. Source
32%32%MA47%30th44%11%16%18%15%
4th grade reading
% 4th graders Proficient in Math on NAEP
More Info
Footnote
Source: National Center for Education Statistics. The nation's report card: Math 2009. Source
38%36%MA57%32nd52%11%2%18%23%
 
  Are Students On-Track as They Enter High School? Equity Gap
  Metric Current 2-Year Prior Leading State IL Rank White Afr Am Latino Low Inc Spec Ed
 
Progress8th grade math
% 8th graders Proficient in Reading on NAEP
More Info
Footnote
Source: National Center for Education Statistics. The nation's report card: Reading 2009. Source
33%30%MA, CT43%25th42%10%18516%10%
8th grade reading
% 8th graders Proficient in Math on NAEP
More Info
Footnote
Source: National Center for Education Statistics. The nation's report card: Math 2009. Source
33%31%MA52%31st44%9%17%14%8%
College-track math
% 8th graders Enrolled in College Track Math
Footnote
Students who take and master Algebra in the 8th grade do better in high school and beyond. The data here is based on a one time report of 8th graders taking advanced Math, including Algebra 1-2 and Geometry. Data on student mastery would be preferable. Source: The Brown Center on Education Policy (Brookings Institute). The Misplaced Math Student: Lost in Eighth-Grade Algebra. 2008.
33%N/ACA59%27thData unavailable
 
  Are Students Completing High School Ready for College or Career? Equity Gap
  Metric Current 2-Year Prior Leading State IL Rank White Afr Am Latino Low Inc Spec Ed
 
ProgressGraduation rate
% high schoolers graduating
More Info
Footnote
Calculated using the widely accepted Cumulative Promotion Index method. See www.advanceillinois.org/reportcard for more details. Source: Education Week, Education Counts Reference Center. 2007. Source
75%77%NJ83%19th83%53557%N/AN/A
College-ready curriculum
% Students Who Report Taking a College-Ready Curriculum
Footnote
Based on self-reported data from students taking ACT exam, and relies upon the ACT's definition of a college ready curriculum. It is important to note that low participation can distort results upwards, so Illinois' high participation rate (97%) should be considered when comparing states. The longitudinal data system currently being developed should enable the state to track course-taking at the student level. Source: American College Testing. 2009. Source
52%38%VA87%50th57%42%42%N/AN/A
College readiness ACT
% Students Demonstrating College-Readiness on ACT
More Info
Footnote
Percent of students meeting ACT college readiness benchmarks in all four subjects. (For information on the benchmarks, reference Source). This excludes states with less than 50% student participation in ACT tests. Illinois is the top scoring state (out of five) that requires all students to take the exam. Source: American College Testing. 2009. Source (for Illinois' results); Source (to compare Illinois with other states).
22%21%MN32%13th30%3%8%N/AN/A
WorkKeys (Reading)
% Students demonstrating work readiness on WorkKeys (Reading)
More Info
Footnote
Illinois is one of a small number of states with 100% participation, making cross-state comparisons unreliable. Source: School Data for All. 2009. Link here.
59%62%N/AN/AN/A68%38%41%40%N/A
WorkKeys (Math)
% Students demonstrating work readiness on WorkKeys (Math)
More Info
Footnote
Illinois is one of a small number of states with 100% participation, making cross-state comparisons unreliable. Source: School Data for All. 2009. Link here.
60%61%N/AN/AN/A71%30%44%38%N/A
 
  Do Illinois Children Have Access to Challenging Programs? Equity Gap
  Metric Current 2-Year Prior Leading State IL Rank White Afr Am Latino Low Inc Spec Ed
 
AccessAdvanced coursework
% High School students enrolled in advanced coursework
Footnote
Students who take advanced coursework in high school do better in college. This metric tracks students scoring 3 or higher on AP exams, in addition to students submitted for the International Baccalaureate. Source: CollegeBoard. The 6th Annual AP Report to the Nation. 2010. Source
16%15%MD26%26thN/A3%10%N/AN/A
Dual credit
% High school students enrolled in dual credit courses
Footnote
This measures the number of students taking courses for which they can receive both high school and college credit. Source: Illinois Community College Board. 2009. Source
12%10%N/AN/AN/AData unavailable
 
  Are Illinois Children Taught by Effective Educators? Equity Gap
  Metric Current 2-Year Prior Leading State IL Rank White Afr Am Latino Low Inc Spec Ed
 
EnvironmentQualified instructors
% Students taught by teachers teaching in field
Footnote
Teachers who teach “in field” – that is, teach in the content area in which they are certified and have expertise – have greater impact. This metric notes the percentage of secondary school students taught by a teacher with an undergraduate or graduate degree in the subject they are teaching. Source: Measuring Up. 2008. Source
74%70%MN86%23rdData unavailable
Teacher quality
% Teachers Demonstrating Effectiveness
Footnote
At present we have no agreed upon way of measuring the impact our teachers are having in the classroom.
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AData unavailable
 
  Are We Providing Students with an Environment that Supports Learning? Equity Gap
  Metric Current 2-Year Prior Leading State IL Rank White Afr Am Latino Low Inc Spec Ed
 
EnvironmentInstructional time
Minimum Instructional Hours per Year
More Info
Footnote
Amount of time on task – especially for at-risk students – may impact achievement. This metric looks at the minimum required hours and days in each state. Source: Education Commission of the States. Number of Instructional Days/Hours in the School Year. 2008. Source
880880TX126041stData unavailable
School safety
% Teachers reporting a safe school environment
More Info
Footnote
School climate metrics are related to student achievement and growth. The TeLL survey we use here is not taken in all states, and Illinois administered it to an unrepresentative sample of districts in 2005. This makes state comparisons unreliable, and underscores the need for more rigorous and reliable state-level data in this area. Source: New Teacher Center. Illinois Teaching, Learning and Leading Survey: Final Report. 2008. Source
70%N/AKS87%7th / 7N/AN/AN/A65%N/A
Trust and respect
% Teachers reporting an atmosphere of trust and mutual respect
More Info
Footnote
School climate metrics are related to student achievement and growth. The TeLL survey we use here is not taken in all states, and Illinois administered it to an unrepresentative sample of districts in 2005. This makes state comparisons unreliable, and underscores the need for more rigorous and reliable state-level data in this area. Source: New Teacher Center. Illinois Teaching, Learning and Leading Survey: Final Report. 2008. Source
56%N/AAL68%6th / 6N/AN/AN/A54%N/A
School environment
% Teachers reporting their school a good place to work and learn
More Info
Footnote
School climate metrics are related to student achievement and growth. The TeLL survey we use here is not taken in all states, and Illinois administered it to an unrepresentative sample of districts in 2005. This makes state comparisons unreliable, and underscores the need for more rigorous and reliable state-level data in this area. Source: New Teacher Center. Illinois Teaching, Learning and Leading Survey: Final Report. 2008. Source
39%N/AAL58%8th / 10Data unavailable
Time for instruction
% Principals reporting sufficient time to focus on instruction
More Info
Footnote
School climate metrics are related to student achievement and growth. The TeLL survey we use here is not taken in all states, and Illinois administered it to an unrepresentative sample of districts in 2005. This makes state comparisons unreliable, and underscores the need for more rigorous and reliable state-level data in this area. Source: New Teacher Center. Illinois Teaching, Learning and Leading Survey: Final Report. 2008. Source
24%N/ANC53%6th / 6Data unavailable
School leadership
% Teachers reporting effective school leadership
More Info
Footnote
School climate metrics are related to student achievement and growth. The TeLL survey we use here is not taken in all states, and Illinois administered it to an unrepresentative sample of districts in 2005. This makes state comparisons unreliable, and underscores the need for more rigorous and reliable state-level data in this area. Source: New Teacher Center. Illinois Teaching, Learning and Leading Survey: Final Report. 2008. Source
54%N/AAL77%5th / 6Data unavailable
Parental engagement
% Teachers reporting constructive parent engagement
More Info
Footnote
School climate metrics are related to student achievement and growth. The TeLL survey we use here is not taken in all states, and Illinois administered it to an unrepresentative sample of districts in 2005. This makes state comparisons unreliable, and underscores the need for more rigorous and reliable state-level data in this area. Source: New Teacher Center. Illinois Teaching, Learning and Leading Survey: Final Report. 2008. Source
52%52%IL52%7th / 7N/AN/AN/A29%N/A
Student-Counselor
K-12 students per counselor (low value best)
More Info
Footnote
The American School Counselor Association recommends one counselor for every 250 students, however the national average is one counselor for every 475 students. Our data excludes leading state Rhode Island because of size concerns.
HS 1:292, K-8 1:1464N/ATX/VT; LA1:125; 1:24133rd; 42ndData unavailable
Teacher turnover
% Teacher turnover
More Info
Footnote
School climate metrics are related to student achievement and growth. The TeLL survey we use here is not taken in all states, and Illinois administered it to an unrepresentative sample of districts in 2005. This makes state comparisons unreliable, and underscores the need for more rigorous and reliable state-level data in this area. Source: New Teacher Center. Illinois Teaching, Learning and Leading Survey: Final Report. 2008. Source
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AData unavailable
 
  Are Students On-Track? Equity Gap
  Metric Current 2-Year Prior Leading State IL Rank White Afr Am Latino Low Inc Spec Ed
 
ProgressChronic truancy
% students absent for more than 10% of days
Footnote
Chronic truants are more likely to drop out, as average attendance at school does not provide a clear student picture. (Source: U.S. Department of Education. Truancy: A Serious Problem for Schools, Students and Society. 2001. Source) This measures students who were absent from school without valid cause for 18 or more of the last 180 school days (greater than 10%). Indeed, tracking students who miss 5% of school days in a year identifies students who are at-risk of dropping out, but the state does not collect this data. Source: Interactive Illinois Report Card. 2009. Source
3.7%2.5%N/AN/AN/AData unavailable
Freshmen on track
% Freshman On Track to Graduate from High School
Footnote
Only Chicago currently tracks whether freshmen are on-track to achieve sophomore status on time, a measure which is highly predictive of whether students are set to graduate. (Source: Consortium on Chicago School Research. The On-Track Indicator as a Predictor of High School Graduation. 2005. Source) New data systems currently in development should give us this information on the state level.
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AData unavailable
Academic growth
% Students Demonstrating Appropriate Academic Growth
More Info
Footnote
Systems are currently being developed that will give us a clearer picture of how much students are learning from year to year, going beyond a simple snapshot to a richer picture of the system's effectiveness.
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AData unavailable
 
  Are Students Entering and Completing Some Post-Secondary Education? Equity Gap
  Metric Current 2-Year Prior Leading State IL Rank White Afr Am Latino Low Inc Spec Ed
 
AccessEnrollment
% 18 – 24 year olds Enrolled in Post-Secondary Education
More Info
Footnote
Source: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems. 2007. Source
33%33%RI531st45%29%N/AN/AN/A
 
ProgressAdult qualifications
% Adults 25 and over with an associates degree or higher
More Info
Footnote
Ultimately, the educational attainment of our population must improve if we are to remain economically competitive. Source: U.S. Census Bureau.
37%36%DC51%18th41%27%16%N/AN/A
Inactivity
% Young adults out of school, out of work (low value is best)
13%14%IA, ND0.0818thData unavailable
Graduation rate: 2-year institutions (Public)
Post-secondary graduation rate for public 2-year institutions
More Info
Footnote
North Dakota and Wyoming are leading states, but were excluded due to small size. This measure has limited comparability across time because institutions report at different rates: Source: Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). 2008. Source here.
21%21%FL39%18th of 3725%9%13%N/AN/A
Graduation rate: 2-year institutions (Private)
Post-secondary graduation rate for private 2-year institutions
More Info
Footnote
North Dakota and Wyoming are leading states, but were excluded due to small size. This measure has limited comparability across time because institutions report at different rates: Source: Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). 2008. Source here.
56%61%IA75%9th of 2570%55%64%N/AN/A
Graduation rate: 4-year institutions (Public)
Post-secondary graduation rate for public 4-year institutions
More Info
Footnote
North Dakota and Wyoming are leading states, but were excluded due to small size. This measure has limited comparability across time because institutions report at different rates: Source: Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). 2008. Source here.
60%59%DE71%11th of 4764%37%46%N/AN/A
Graduation rate: 4-year institutions (Private)
Post-secondary graduation rate for private 4-year institutions
More Info
Footnote
North Dakota and Wyoming are leading states, but were excluded due to small size. This measure has limited comparability across time because institutions report at different rates: Source: Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). 2008. Source here.
61%63%DC75%21st of 3865%32%44%N/AN/A
 
  Is College Affordable and Are Students Finishing On-Time? Equity Gap
  Metric Current 2-Year Prior Leading State IL Rank White Afr Am Latino Low Inc Spec Ed
 
EnvironmentCost of college
% Income Necessary to Pay for College
More Info
Footnote
This includes need-based grant assistance available from the state and individual institutions. Source: NCES, IPEDS Enrollment Survey. 2008. Source
35%30%TN13%42ndN/AN/AN/A53%N/A
 
Progress4-year univs graduating 60% (Public)
4-year univs graduating 60% of students in 6 years (Public)
More Info
Footnote
Nationally, 64% of students graduate from 4-year institutions in 6 years. This measures which institutions in Illinois come close to matching the national average, keeping in mind that some institutions serve disproportionately high-need populations. Due to gaps in 2-year prior data, data is not directly comparable. Source: Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System. 2008. Link here.
33%30%IA, DE100%11th33%11%22%N/AN/A
4-year univs graduating 60% (Private)
4-year univs graduating 60% of students in 6 years (Private)
More Info
Footnote
Nationally, 64% of students graduate from 4-year institutions in 6 years. This measures which institutions in Illinois come close to matching the national average, keeping in mind that some institutions serve disproportionately high-need populations. Due to gaps in 2-year prior data, data is not directly comparable. Source: Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System. 2008. Link here.
45%46%MD89%21st61%16%32%N/AN/A
 
  Are Students On-Track? Equity Gap
  Metric Current 2-Year Prior Leading State IL Rank White Afr Am Latino Low Inc Spec Ed
 
ProgressRemedial coursework
% Freshmen taking remedial coursework (low value is best)
TBDTBDN/AN/AN/AData unavailable
Freshmen returning (2-year public)
Freshmen returning 2nd year (2-year public institutions)
More Info
Footnote
For comparability, this ranking excludes all states with a freshmen population less than10% that of Illinois. Source: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems. NCES, IPEDS Enrollment Survey. 2008. Link here.
50%51%FL61%27th of 37Data unavailable
Freshmen returning (2-year private)
Freshmen returning 2nd year (2-year private institutions)
More Info
Footnote
For comparability, this ranking excludes all states with a freshmen population less than10% that of Illinois. Source: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems. NCES, IPEDS Enrollment Survey. 2008. Link here.
55%56%AZ78%23rd of 28Data unavailable
Freshmen returning (4-year public)
Freshmen returning 2nd year (4-year public institutions)
More Info
Footnote
For comparability, this ranking excludes all states with a freshmen population less than10% that of Illinois. Source: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems. NCES, IPEDS Enrollment Survey. 2008. Link here.
80%81%VA86%12th of 49Data unavailable
Freshmen returning (4-year private not for profit)
Freshmen returning 2nd year (4-year private not for profit institutions)
More Info
Footnote
For comparability, this ranking excludes all states with a freshmen population less than10% that of Illinois. Source: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems. NCES, IPEDS Enrollment Survey. 2008. Link here.
77%77%MA85%11th of 33Data unavailable